Friday, January 22, 2010

Global Aquatics Ontario To Those Who Believe In A Global Flood...?

To those who believe in a global flood...? - global aquatics ontario

1. From the land of the living plant basis, it can not survive in an aquatic environment, especially salt water, what happens is that all terrestrial plants during flooding (eg trees, shrubs, grasses), y including the redwood trees?

2. History of humanity in Biblical times, exrtemely an important relationship between plants and organisms, the exchange of O2 and trading of carbon dioxide. Given this fact, the whole of humanity should not die, regardless of a bow?

3. Polar bears and other animals are geared for arctic environments. The giant panda has a diet that consists entirely of bamboo found in remote areas of China. As these animals survived the trip to the Arc, then landed Arcs final resting place?

4. Kin of the prehistoric Komodo dragon is wild in the same geographical region, Indonesia and Australia, was the Megalania: 4300 Lb and 23 meters. Lizard () really a dinosaur. How these prehistoric creatures have survived a worldwide flood?

11 comments:

  1. This should be fun.

    I love pandas, and I share the website PandaCam (for the National Zoo), with their families. Some of them were really angry, because pandas blog post named in a direction from other bears million years! The hell of it, must be clearly informed as often counter to other species of bears, bears hibernate, they eat, like other bears, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This should be fun.

    I love pandas, and I share the website PandaCam (for the National Zoo), with their families. Some of them were really angry, because pandas blog post named in a direction from other bears million years! The hell of it, must be clearly informed as often counter to other species of bears, bears hibernate, they eat, like other bears, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This should be fun.

    I love pandas, and I share the website PandaCam (for the National Zoo), with their families. Some of them were really angry, because pandas blog post named in a direction from other bears million years! The hell of it, must be clearly informed as often counter to other species of bears, bears hibernate, they eat, like other bears, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  4. With God all things are possible!

    ReplyDelete
  5. God has willed that all sinners to die ... so nature has been brought back to life ... It's so easy!

    ReplyDelete
  6. God has willed that all sinners to die ... so nature has been brought back to life ... It's so easy!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Flood-believers have always been a direct response to the embarrassing question:

    Magic!

    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Flood-believers have always been a direct response to the embarrassing question:

    Magic!

    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  9. He created one time why he did not get in a position or to increase again as water receded. Never been to the zoo in Asheboro? with polar bears in the suburbs. Why should we be God in a box? Man is not who knows, as we know create the life out of nothing, God is known and will ever know. Faith is the answer is that, believe it or not. The choice is yours.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The flood was an ancient Babylonian / Sumerian myth has been adapted to a Jewish audience. To put it differently, as a tissue to see the myth in the Bible, I believe, undermiming any kind of "love" that God had a sense of creation.

    ReplyDelete
  11. These are just my opinion, no way am a religious expert, I'm just trying to a logical explanation to find these questions, and BTW I think the flooding.

    1. The first is the assumption that the flood was based on salt water, can be a source of water freash, indicating that the salt water is in your question is a HUGE assumption. I think (and I can go in my opinion) that these plants are gone, but the seeds of these plants that have survived to sprout new trees. Seeds can float and be able to survive long enough for the trees that we see today.

    2. It may be true that there is a relationship between plants and animals, but what he does to try to explain a religious event on the basis of scientific evidence, IMO will find the two do not mix. In a religious perspective, if the flooding by an act of God, then was apparently causes the scheme could have been doubled by God for life in the Ark in trying to survive. In a religious perspective, God has the rules so that God can change them as it sees fit.

    3. POlar and pandas live and spread in the body ADAPT to live with nature, animals that we see today are adapted to their specific environment are, then maybe (again only my opinion) that are known today, polar bears have adapted, because in this environment to live, have not yet begun, that the polar bears come to the passage of time in this environment. In other words, assume that as the polar bears began.

    4. I can not say much (and a possible explanation), but what is incorectly try to find answers to religious questions through scientific research .... not simply connected. If science has caused the Komodo dragon, the return Megalania a presumption (is), then use this information in science, you can not ask the religion to explain why it corresponds to what the learned. "

    ReplyDelete